Fire authority members warned against backing government cuts to service

Firefighters in the UK have warned politicians that plans to axe 49 firefighter jobs at Avon Fire and Rescue Service represent an “unacceptable and dangerous” threat to the safety of the public.

aon-frs-ap-live-incident
Pic: (Avon FRS Aerial Platform)

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has reported that the proposals, which will be voted upon by fire authority members on 10 February, would see the downgrading of Yate fire station to a day crewed system, meaning an immediate response will only be available during the hours of 8am-5pm, with night cover being reduced to one on-call appliance only.

960-avon-fire-stations-yates-station
Photo: Yates Fire Station (Pic: Avon Fire & Rescue Service)

These changes, would also mean that specialist aerial appliances which are used for rescues from high rise buildings, could not be guaranteed for mobilisation and the heavy rescue special appliance in Avonmouth, used in serious road collisions, would no longer have a dedicated 24-hour crew seven days a week.

960-avon-fire-stations-avonmouth
Photo: Avonmouth Fire Station (Pic: Avon Fire & Rescue Service)

Bristol’s Avon Fire and Rescue Service has responsibility for 21 fire stations in four Unitary authority’s or Municipal Districts. The four unitary areas are Bath & North East Somerset (5 stations), Bristol (4 stations), North Somerset (8 stations) and South Gloucestershire (4 stations). Avon’s fire brigade headquarters which became operational in November last year is located at Temple Fire Station, Temple Back in Bristol.

The FBU has said the combination of these cuts will mean slower response times to emergencies, increasing the risk to both firefighters and the public. The campaign against the potential cuts is being led by the FBU, whose campaigns also supported by Bristol MPs Kerry McCarthy, Thangam Debbonaire and Karin Smyth.

Last month, a joint letter from the MP’s was sent to the Home Office demanding that the government ‘give our firefighters the resources they need to keep us safe’. The FBU’s formal response to the public consultation, which closed on 31 December, calls for members of the Avon Fire and Rescue Authority at Temple Headquarters to reject the proposals saying ‘it is time to recognise the dangerous impact these cuts would have on public safety if they are voted through’.

960-avon-fire-rescue-service-hq
Photo: Avon Headquarters at Temple Fire Station
(Pic: Avon Fire & Rescue Service)

Bristol firefighter and chair of the FBU in Avon is Gary Spindler. He said: “Firefighters in Avon believe these cuts would seriously compromise our ability to deal with emergency incidents and keep the public safe. They are a step too far and it’s time for the government to start listening and stop cutting. Firefighters have been out on the streets asking the public for support against these cuts and the response has been overwhelming. They took the time to listen to our concerns and offered us their support, signing our petition and expressing their alarm at these proposed cuts.”

“The measures are not supported by either the professionals who deliver the fire and rescue service or the public who receive it. If the consultation process is meaningful then the politicians who are proposing these cuts need to think again and make sure that the government gets the message. The fire and rescue service is a lifesaving emergency service which requires investment – not cuts.”

aon-frs-ap-live-incident